Could, Would and Should
‘Would’, ‘should’ and ‘could’ are auxiliary verbs, meaning that their function is to assist main verbs. For example, in the sentence, ‘I would like to meet him’, ‘like’ is the main verb that is assisted by ‘would’. They can be defined as the past tenses respectively of will, shall and can, but each has many uses that sometimes even express the present tense. It is important to be able to differentiate between the three so as not to use them incorrectly. We shall discuss some of the common functions of the three words here.
Would
-
To ask questions:
-
With ‘who’, ‘what’, ‘when’, ‘where’, ‘why’, ‘how’:
What would she do?
In both sentences, ‘would’ is more or less interchangeable with ‘will’.
-
To make polite requests:
-
To show a different response if the past had been different:
-
To explain an outcome to a hypothetical situation:
-
To show habitual past action:
Think of ‘would’ as ‘did’.
-
To show preference between two choices, used with rather or sooner:
-
To show intention:
Should
-
To ask questions (it is generally interchangeable with ‘ought’ in such cases):
-
To show obligation:
Here, too, ‘should’ can be replaced with ‘ought to’, but in this context it is used to make a persuasive statement.
-
To express a hypothetical situation:
-
To express what is likely:
Here ‘should’ means something like ‘probably will’.
Could
-
As the past tense of can:
-
To ask questions:
-
To show possibility:
-
To express tentativeness or politeness:
No comments:
Post a Comment